4.7 Article

Peroxidase activity-structure relationship of the intermolecular four-stranded G-quadruplex-hemin complexes and their application in Hg2+ ion detection

期刊

TALANTA
卷 80, 期 2, 页码 459-465

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.talanta.2009.07.010

关键词

DNAzyme; G-quadruplex; Hemin; Peroxidase; Mercury ion detection

资金

  1. National Basic Research Program of China [2006CB705700]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of Tianjin [08JCZDJC21200]
  3. Natural Science Foundation of China [20675041]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The peroxidase activities of the complexes of hemin and intermolecular four-stranded G-quadruplexes formed by short-stranded X(n)G(m)X(p) sequences (X = A, T or C) especially T(n)G(m)T(p) sequences. were compared. The results, combining with those of circular dichroism (CD) spectra and acid-base transition study for DNA-hemin complexes, provide some important information about DNAzymes based on G-quadruplex-hemin complexes, such as the formation of a G-quadruplex structure is an important factor for determining whether a DNA sequence can enhance the catalytic activity of hemin; both intramolecular parallel G-quadruplexes and intermolecular four-stranded parallel G-quadruplexes can enhance the catalytic activity of hemin; the addition of T nucleotides to the 5'-end of a G-tract confers corresponding G-quadruplex greatly enhanced catalytic activity, whereas the addition of T nucleotides to the 3'-end of the G-tract has little effect; the high catalytic activity of hemin in the presence of some short-stranded G-rich sequences may be a result of the reduction of the acidity of the bound hemin cofactor. These studies provide more information for the DNA-hemin peroxidase model system, may help to elucidate the structure-function relationship of peroxidse enzymes and to develop novel, highly efficient peroxidase-liking DNAzymes. As a sequence of such an investigation, a new Hg2+ detection method was developed. (C) 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据