4.4 Article

Health utility outcomes in patients undergoing medical management for chronic rhinosinusitis: a prospective multiinstitutional study

期刊

INTERNATIONAL FORUM OF ALLERGY & RHINOLOGY
卷 5, 期 11, 页码 1018-1027

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/alr.21588

关键词

sinusitis; endoscopy; chronic disease; quality of life; therapeutics; medication therapy management; utility; health utility; cost-effectiveness

资金

  1. NIH (National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders [NIDCD]) [R01 DC005805, R03 DC-013651]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: A health utility value represents an individual's preference for living in a specific health state and is used in cost-utility analyses. This study investigates the impact of continuing medical therapy on health utility outcomes in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS). Methods: The Medical Outcomes Study Short Form-6D (SF-6D) questionnaire was administered to patients prospectively enrolled in a longitudinal study examining treatment outcomes for CRS. Patients were prescribed robust, initial medical therapy and then elected to continue with medical therapy (n = 40) or undergo endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS), followed by medical therapy (n = 152). Patients observed through treatment crossover to ESS were also evaluated (n = 20). Health utility values (SF-6D) were generated at baseline, 6-months, and 12-months follow-up for both cohorts and evaluated using repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA). Results: Treatment crossover patients were found to have a significantly higher prevalence of previous sinus surgery compared to medical management (chi(2) = 6.91; p = 0.009) and surgical intervention (chi(2) = 8.11; p = 0.004) subgroups. Mean baseline utility value for the medical therapy cohort was significantly better compared to the ESS cohort (mean +/- standard deviation; 0.76 +/- 0.12 vs 0.70 +/- 0.15; p = 0.023). Significant improvement in health utility was reported in the ESS cohort (F-(2) = 37.69; p < 0.001), whereas values remained stable, without significant improvement, in both the medical therapy cohort (F-(2) = 0.03; p = 0.967) and treatment crossover cohort (F-(2) = 2.36; p = 0.115). Conclusion: Patients electing continued medical management report better baseline health utility compared to patients electing ESS. Patients electing ESS show significant improvement in health utility, whereas those electing continued medical management demonstrate stable health utility over 12 months. (C) 2015 ARS-AAOA, LLC.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据