4.7 Article

Analysis of parabens in cosmetics by low pressure liquid chromatography with monolithic column and chemiluminescent detection

期刊

TALANTA
卷 79, 期 2, 页码 499-506

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.talanta.2009.04.012

关键词

Parabens determination; Chemiluminescence; Monolithic mini-column; Low pressure liquid chromatography; Cerium(IV)-Rhodamine 6G chemistry; Cosmetics

资金

  1. Ministerio de Educacion y Ciencia, Direccion General de Ensenanza Superior (Spain) [CTQ2005-09060-CO2-01, CTQ2005-09060-CO2-02, P06-FQM-01467]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper presents an application of chromatographic separation based on an ultra-short monolithic column and chemiluminescent detection in an FIA type instrument manifold for the determination of four paraben mixtures: methylparaben (MP), ethylparaben (EP), propylparaben (PP) and butylparaben (BP). The separation is achieved in 150 s using two consecutive carriers: first 12% ACN:water that changes 75 s after injection to 27% ACN:water. The detection is based on the oxidation of the hydrolysis product of parabens, p-hydroxybenzoic acid, with Ce(IV) in the presence of Rhodamine 6G which evokes chemiluminescence Of sufficient intensity to enable a sensitive determination of these species. After optimization of the variables involved, the analytical method is characterized, displaying the following values for concentration ranges, detection limits and precision, as relative standard deviation at low concentration (0.15 mg l(-1))-MP: from 9.9 x 10(-7) to 3.3 x 10(-4) M; 1.9 x 10(-8); 5.6%; EP: from 9.0 x 10(-7) to 3.3 x 10(-4) M; 2.8 x 10(-8); 3.5%; PP: from 8.3 x 10(-7) to 9.9 x 10(-5) M; 2.3 x 10(-8); 4.2%; and BP: from 7.7 x 10(-7) to 9.9 x 10(-5) M; 4.2 x 10(-8) M; 6.2%. The method was applied and validated satisfactorily for the determination of these parabens in cosmetic samples, comparing the results against a liquid chromatography reference method. (C) 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据