4.7 Article

Fractionation analysis of oxyanion-forming metals and metalloids in leachates of cement-based materials using ion exchange solid phase extraction

期刊

TALANTA
卷 78, 期 3, 页码 736-742

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.talanta.2008.12.036

关键词

Fractionation analysis; Ion-exchange SPE; Oxyanions; pH dependent leaching

资金

  1. Norwegian Quota Scholarship Program

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A simple and versatile solid phase extraction (SPE) method has been developed to determine the anionic species of As. Cr, Mo, Sb, Se and V in leachates of cement mortar and concrete materials in the pH range 3-13. The anionic fractions of these elements were extracted using a strong anion exchanger (SAX) and their concentrations were determined as the difference in element concentration between the sample and the SAX effluent. Inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) was used off-line to analyse solutions before and after passing through the SAX. The extraction method has been developed by optimizing sorbent type, sorbent conditioning and sample percolation rate. Breakthrough volumes and effect of matrix constituents were also studied. It Was found that a polymer-based SAX conditioned with a buffer close to the sample pH or in some cases deionised water gave the best retention of the analytes. Optimal conditions were also determined for the quantitative elution of analytes retained oil the SAX. Extraction of the cement mortar and concrete leachates showed that most of the elements had Similar distribution of anions in both leachate types, and that the distribution was strongly pH dependent. Cr. Mo and V exist in anionic forms in strongly basic leachates (pH > 12), and significant fractions of anionic Se Were also detected in these Solutions. Cr, Mo, Se and V were not determined as anions by the present method in the leachates of pH < 12. Anionic As and Sb were found in small fractions in most of the leachates. (C) 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据