4.4 Article

Dose-response relationship of specific allergen exposure-induced immunological tolerance: a mouse model

期刊

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/alr.21551

关键词

aeroallergens; allergens; allergy immunotherapy; asthma; inhalation allergen challenge

资金

  1. Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan [TCVGH-1007004C]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BackgroundIt is believed that adequate allergen preimmunization exposure could induce immunologic tolerance. The purpose of this study was to investigate the dose-dependent mechanisms related to antigen-specific tolerance induction in a mouse model. MethodsMice were assigned to 5 groups: the control (Cont) group received phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) preimmunization exposure and PBS sham immunization; the other 4 groups were exposed preimmunization to PBS (PBS group) or ovalbumin (OVA) (first mucosal doses: 1.25%, 2.5%, or 5% wt/vol aerosol from days -3 to -1) prior to OVA immunization. The OVA-immunized mice received intraperitoneal doses of 20 g OVA (on days 1, 7, and 14), and then a second set of mucosal doses with 0.5% wt/vol OVA aerosol (on days 18 to 20). After assessment of airway hyperresponsiveness (AHR), the mice were euthanized and their blood, bronchoalveolar lavage fluids (BALFs), and lung tissues were collected for further analyses. ResultsOVA-immunized mice exposed to OVA preimmunization had reduced AHR and immunoglobulin E production when compared to the PBS group. OVA preimmunization exposure inhibited eosinophilic inflammation in lung tissues. The proportions of BALF eosinophil counts from the groups exposed to OVA preimmunization were significantly decreased when compared with those exposed to PBS preimmunization. The balance of T helper 2 (Th2) and T regulatory (Treg) cytokines in BALFs were additionally observed in this mouse model. ConclusionOur results suggest that preimmunization exposure to an appropriate dose of a specific antigen could suppress allergic airway inflammation by induction of immunological tolerance.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据