4.3 Article

Assessment of Estrogen Receptors and Apoptotic Factors in Cryopreserved Human Ovarian Cortex

期刊

SYSTEMS BIOLOGY IN REPRODUCTIVE MEDICINE
卷 55, 期 5-6, 页码 236-243

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.3109/19396360903046761

关键词

apoptosis; cryopreservation; estrogen receptors; ovarian tissue

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The aims of this study were: (i) to examine frozen-thawed ovarian tissues for features of follicular health and atresia by histology; 60 to assess the expression of estrogen receptors alpha (ER alpha) and beta (ER beta) by real-time PCR; (iii) to evaluate the Bax/Bcl-2 ratio, as an apoptotic index, in the ovarian tissues before and after cryopreservation. Ovarian cortical biopsies were obtained from 11 patients. The fragments were subdivided into two groups, fresh (control tissues) and cryopreserved tissues obtained by direct plunging into liquid nitrogen. Both tissue groups were subjected to a histological evaluation of the healthy and atretic follicles, immunohistochemical localization of the ER, and a real-time PCR (qPCR) to evaluate the expression of ER, Bax, Bcl-2 as well as beta-actin, as control gene. Damage was observed in 31% of primordial, 45% of primary, and 75% of secondary follicles in the cryopreserved tissue group. The qPCR analysis showed that the level of ER beta was greater in fresh than cryopreserved tissues, whereas the ER alpha expression and Bax/Bcl-2 ratio were similar in both tissue groups. A significant inverse association was observed between ER alpha mRNA levels in the fresh tissue group and subjects' ages. The results show that cryopreservation and thawing of human ovarian tissue does not affect the morphology of primordial or primary follicles and that cryopreservation does not affect apoptosis. However, cryopreservation seems to have an inhibitory effect on the level of ER beta. Additional studies are needed to evaluate the differential effects of freezing follicles at different stages of follicular development and ovarian steroidogenesis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据