4.2 Article

The curious case of Neotroglocarcinus dawydoffi (Decapoda, Cryptochiridae): unforeseen biogeographic patterns resulting from isolation

期刊

SYSTEMATICS AND BIODIVERSITY
卷 12, 期 4, 页码 503-512

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/14772000.2014.946979

关键词

16S; COI; distribution records; phylogeography; Pseudocryptochirus; speciation

资金

  1. A.M. Buitendijkfonds
  2. L.B. Holthuisfonds
  3. J.J. ter Pelkwijkfonds (all Naturalis)
  4. Stichting Fonds Doctor Catharine van Tussenbroek (Nell Ongeboerfonds)
  5. Schure-Beijerinck-Poppingfonds (KNAW)
  6. Van Tienhoven Foundation for International Nature Protection
  7. WWF-Malaysia
  8. Malaysian Ministry of Science, Technology and Innovation
  9. USAID Coral Triangle Support Partnership
  10. KAUST

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Coral gall crabs form a commonly overlooked component of the associated fauna of shallow-water reef corals and therefore little is known about their ecology and biogeography. This study investigated the biogeography and phylogenetic position of the informal Detocarcini' species group within the Cryptochiridae. We used molecular data for two mitochondrial markers (COI and 16S) obtained from gall crabs covering (part of) a wide geographic range: the Red Sea, Malaysia, Indonesia and New Caledonia. Our phylogeny reconstructions portrayed the Detocarcini' as paraphyletic within the monophyletic Cryptochiridae. A phylogeographic clustering was noticed in Neotroglocarcinus dawydoffi that was absent in its sister species, N. hongkongensis, and the closely related species Pseudocryptochirus viridis. A Neighbour Network was estimated for the N. dawydoffi dataset to visualize the similarity between sequences from different biogeographic areas, resulting in three groupings: (1) New Caledonia with Lembeh/Ternate (eastern Indonesia), (2) Semporna/Kudat (eastern Malaysia), and (3) Red Sea (Saudi Arabia). Cryptic speciation rather than isolation is discussed and rejected as an alternative explanation for the observed biogeographic pattern.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据