4.0 Article

Species Delimitations and Phylogenetic Relationships within the Fully Myco-heterotrophic Hexalectris (Orchidaceae)

期刊

SYSTEMATIC BOTANY
卷 35, 期 1, 页码 64-76

出版社

AMER SOC PLANT TAXONOMISTS
DOI: 10.1600/036364410790862489

关键词

hybridization; incomplete lineage sorting; incongruence; ITS; phylogenetic species; plastid DNA sequences

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Phylogenetic analyses were conducted on six plastid markers and ITS from 43 accessions representing all eight currently recognized Hexalectris species with the goals of testing species circumscriptions and determining interspecific relationships. The monophyly of H. warnockii, H. grandiflora, H. brevicaulis, and H. nitida, plus the H. spicata species complex, are strongly supported. The remaining species are not monophyletic, prompting the recircumscription of H. spicata s. l. as H. spicata s. s. and H. arizonica, H. revoluta s. l. as H. revoluta s. s. and H. colemanii, and H. fallax as a synonym of H. parviflora. Four major morphologically distinct lineages exist within the genus: H. warnockii, H. grandiflora, H. brevicaulis, and the H. spicata species complex. Within the latter, only H. spicata s. s. and H. nitida are strongly supported as sister species among all trees. The positions of H. revoluta s. s. and H. parviflora remain unresolved due to incongruence in the plastid trees when psbA is included or excluded while the positions of H. colemanii and H. arizonica are unclear due to incongruence between plastid and ITS topologies. The latter incongruence suggests that either or both species are of hybrid origin or that the ITS topology has been influenced by incomplete lineage sorting.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据