4.6 Article

Dating Primate Divergences through an Integrated Analysis of Palaeontological and Molecular Data

期刊

SYSTEMATIC BIOLOGY
卷 60, 期 1, 页码 16-31

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/sysbio/syq054

关键词

Approximate Bayesian computation; molecular phylogeny; palaeontological data; primate divergence

资金

  1. Biotechnological and Biological Sciences Research Council
  2. National Center for Research Resources (NCRR), a component of the National Institutes of Health (NIH) [RR03037]
  3. Cancer Research UK [19556] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Estimation of divergence times is usually done using either the fossil record or sequence data from modern species. We provide an integrated analysis of palaeontological and molecular data to give estimates of primate divergence times that utilize both sources of information. The number of preserved primate species discovered in the fossil record, along with their geological age distribution, is combined with the number of extant primate species to provide initial estimates of the primate and anthropoid divergence times. This is done by using a stochastic forwards-modeling approach where speciation and fossil preservation and discovery are simulated forward in time. We use the posterior distribution from the fossil analysis as a prior distribution on node ages in a molecular analysis. Sequence data from two genomic regions (CFTR on human chromosome 7 and the CYP7A1 region on chromosome 8) from 15 primate species are used with the birth-death model implemented in mcmctree in PAML to infer the posterior distribution of the ages of 14 nodes in the primate tree. We find that these age estimates are older than previously reported dates for all but one of these nodes. To perform the inference, a new approximate Bayesian computation (ABC) algorithm is introduced, where the structure of the model can be exploited in an ABC-within-Gibbs algorithm to provide a more efficient analysis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据