4.5 Article

Photobacterium piscicola sp nov., isolated from marine fish and spoiled packed cod

期刊

SYSTEMATIC AND APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY
卷 37, 期 5, 页码 329-335

出版社

ELSEVIER GMBH
DOI: 10.1016/j.syapm.2014.05.003

关键词

Photobacterium piscicola sp nov.; Polyphasic taxonomy; Fingerprinting

资金

  1. European Community's Seventh Framework Programme (FP7) [257 FP7-228310]
  2. Federal Public Planning Service-Science Policy, Belgium

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Five isolates from marine fish (W3(T), WM, W1S, S2 and S3) and three isolates misclassified as Photobacterium phosphoreum, originating from spoiled modified atmosphere packed stored cod (NCIMB 13482 and NCIMB 13483) and the intestine of skate (NCIMB 192), were subjected to a polyphasic taxonomic study. Phylogenetic analysis of 16S rRNA gene sequences showed that the isolates were members of the genus Photobacterium. Sequence analysis using the gapA, gyrB, pyrH, recA and rpoA loci showed that these isolates formed a distinct branch in the genus Photobacterium, and were most closely related to Photobacterium aquimaris, Photobacterium kishitanii, Photobacterium phosphoreum and Photobacterium iliopiscarium. The luxA gene was present in isolates W3T, WM, W1S, S2 and S3 but not in NCIMB 13482, NCIMB 13483 and NCIMB 192. AFLP and (GTG)(5)-PCR fingerprinting indicated that the eight isolates represented at least five distinct genotypes. DNA-DNA hybridizations revealed 89% relatedness between isolate W3T and NCIMB 192, and values below 70% with the type strains of the phylogenetically closest species, P. iliopiscarium LMG 19543(T), P. kishitanii LMG 23890(T), P. aquimaris LMG 26951(T) and P. phosphoreum LMG4233(T). The strains of this new taxon could also be distinguished from the latter species by phenotypic characteristics. Therefore, we propose to classify this new taxon as Photobacterium piscicola sp. nov., with W3(T) (=NCCB 100098(T) = LMG 27681(T)) as the type strain. (C) 2014 Elsevier GmbH. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据