4.5 Article

Distribution of putative denitrifying methane oxidizing bacteria in sediment of a freshwater lake, Lake Biwa

期刊

SYSTEMATIC AND APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY
卷 35, 期 4, 页码 233-238

出版社

ELSEVIER GMBH, URBAN & FISCHER VERLAG
DOI: 10.1016/j.syapm.2012.03.005

关键词

Methane oxidation; Denitrification; Freshwater lake; Sediment; NC10 bacteria

资金

  1. JSPS Institutional Program for Young Researcher Overseas Visits
  2. Grant for Joint Research Program of the Institute of Low Temperature Science, Hokkaido University
  3. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology, Japan [22370005]
  4. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [22370005] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Methane oxidation coupled to denitrification is mediated by 'Candidatus methylomirabilis oxyfera', which belongs to the candidate phylum NC10. The distribution of putative denitrifying methane-oxidizing bacteria related to M. oxyfera was investigated in a freshwater lake, Lake Biwa, Japan. In the surface layer of the sediment from a profundal site, a phylotype closely related to M. oxyfera was most frequently detected among NC10 bacteria in PCR analysis of the 16S rRNA gene. In the sediment, sequences related to M. oxyfera were also detected in a pmoA gene library. The presence of NC10 bacteria was also confirmed by catalyzed reporter deposition fluorescence in situ hybridization (CARD-FISH). Denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE) and quantitative real-time PCR indicated that the abundance of the M. oxyfera-related phylotype was higher in the upper layers of the profundal sediment. The horizontal distribution of the putative methanotrophs in lake sediment was also analyzed by DGGE, which revealed that their occurrence was restricted to deep water areas. These results agreed with those in a previous study of another freshwater lake, and suggested that the upper layer of the profundal sediments is the main habitat for denitrifying methanotrophs. (c) 2012 Elsevier GmbH. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据