4.6 Article

Varieties of Integrative Scholarship: Why Rules of Evidence, Criteria, and Standards Matter

期刊

ACADEMIC MEDICINE
卷 90, 期 3, 页码 294-302

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000000585

关键词

-

资金

  1. Institute for Medical Education of the Loyola University Chicago Stritch School of Medicine

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Integrative scholarship involves the aggregation of data and evidence in a way that allows the research community to comprehend and value the connections and perspectives that unite isolated facts and research studies. Integrative scholarship summarizes data, enlightens and informs readers broadly, and sets the stage for subsequent research. This article describes five approaches to integrative scholarshipnarrative, systematic, scoping, critical-realist, open peer commentaryand argues that each approach uses different methods and rules of evidence to combine data and report their meaning. Different forms of integrative scholarship use methods, criteria, and standards that are matched to the integrative approach and data being evaluated. There is no one best strategy to conduct or judge integrative scholarship. Researchers who perform integrative scholarship should openly express the values that underlie their work.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据