4.5 Article

Capacitive behaviour of thermally reduced graphene oxide in a novel ionic liquid containing di-cationic charge

期刊

SYNTHETIC METALS
卷 193, 期 -, 页码 110-116

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.synthmet.2014.04.006

关键词

Ionic liquid; Graphene oxide; Capacitance; Electrolyte

资金

  1. Korean government's National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) [NRF-2012M2B2A-4029624]
  2. Dongguk University-Seoul
  3. Australian Research Council for 3D materials
  4. University of Wollongong, Australia

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A novel ionic liquid (IL) with di-cationic group was synthesized and used to evaluate the supercapacitive behaviour of a thermally reduced graphene oxide (rGO) in comparison with aqueous LiClO4 electrolyte. The morphological properties of GO and thermally reduced GO were characterized by XRD, TEM, Raman spectroscopy, and rGO was found to have a typical structural nature after thermal reduction. The electrochemical performance of the GO and rGO were studied using cyclic voltammetry, impedance spectroscopy and galvanostatic charge/discharge in two different aqueous electrolytes, 0.1 M C-6 (TMA)(2)(BF4)(2) and 0.1 M LiClO4, respectively. Superior capacitive properties were observed from rGO in both the electrolytes than that of GO electrode. Maximum specific capacitances of 102 F g(-1) and 155 F g(-1) from rGO were obtained in 0.1 M LiClO4 and C-6(TMA)(2)(BF4)(2), respectively, at a scan rate of 10 mV s(-1), and that are higher than that of GO (12 F g(-1) and 23 F g(-1) in 0.1 M LiClO4 and C-6(TMA)(2)(BF4)(2), respectively). The charge transfer resistances of the rGO electrode were 18.3 Omega for 0.1 M LiClO4, and 12.8 Omega for 0.1 M C-6(TMA)(2)(BF4)(2). The rGO electrode also exhibited a desirable profile and maintained over 90.6% of its initial capacitance after 2000 cycles, while 63.8% retention was observed in 0.1 M LiClO4, indicating that it has an excellent cycling performance and structural stability in IL compared with the other electrolyte. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据