4.7 Article

Seasonal variations of water soluble composition (WSOC, Hulis and WSIIs) in PM1 and its implications on haze pollution in urban Shanghai, China

期刊

ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT
卷 123, 期 -, 页码 306-314

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.03.010

关键词

PM1; Water soluble organic carbon (WSOC); Humic like substances (Hulis); Water soluble inorganic ions (WSIIs); Liquid water content (LWC); Haze episodes

资金

  1. Ph.D. Programs Foundation of Ministry of Education of China [20120074140001]
  2. NSFC Grant [21277044]
  3. Shanghai Pujiang Program [13PJD013]
  4. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [WB1113005]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A year-long PM 1 samples were collected at ECUST campus from April 2013 to February 2014 in urban Shanghai, China. Annual PM1 was (49.8 +/- 31.8) mu gm(-3), comprising of water soluble organic carbon (WSOC), humic-like substances-carbon (Hulis-C), total water soluble inorganic ions (WSIIs) and liquid water content (LWC). Corresponding values were (5.51 +/- 3.72) mu gm(-3), (2.20 +/- 1.71) mu gm(-3), (22.52 +/- 15.22) mu gm(-3) and (19.0 +/- 19.2) mu gm(-3), respectively. Seasonal variation of PM1 was winter > spring > autumn > summer, while WSOC, Hulis-C, total WSIIs and LWC were highest in winter, with insignificant differences between spring, summer and autumn. Hulis-C and WSOC in PM1 on the serious haze day were found to be 4.4 and 2.5 times higher than those on the clear days, implying that Hulis might be very important for haze pollution. Among total WSIIs, sulfate was more abundant than nitrate on clear days while nitrate eventually surpassed sulfate in haze episodes. LWC in aerosol was significantly negative correlated with visibility and had strong relationship with nitrate and sulfate. It should be noted that LWC is four times sensitive to nitrate than sulfate, hence higher nitrate on haze days in Shanghai might facilitate the hygroscopic growth of aerosol. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据