4.0 Article

Brain Region-Selective Cellular Redistribution of mGlu5 But Not GABAB Receptors Following Methamphetamine-Induced Associative Learning

期刊

SYNAPSE
卷 65, 期 12, 页码 1333-1343

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/syn.20968

关键词

glutamate; GABA; methamphetamine; conditioned place preference

资金

  1. USPHSGs [DA015760, DA023306, DA021475]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Alterations in receptor expression and distribution between cell surface and cytoplasm are means by which psychostimulants regulate neurotransmission. Metabotropic glutamate receptor group I, subtype 5 (mGluR5) and GABA(B) receptors (GABA(B)R) are critically involved in the development and expression of stimulant-induced behaviors, including conditioned place preference (CPP), an index of drug-seeking. However, it is not known if psychostimulant-induced CPP alters the trafficking of these receptors. To fill this gap, this study used methamphetamine (Meth)-induced CPP in rats to ascertain if receptor changes occur in limbic brain regions that regulate drug-seeking, the medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC), nucleus accumbens (NAc), and ventral pallidum (VP). To do so, ex vivo tissue was assessed for changes in expression and surface vs. intracellular distribution of mGluR5 and GABA(B)Rs. There was a decrease in the surface to intracellular ratio of mGluR5 in the mPFC in Meth-conditioned rats, commensurate with an increase in intracellular levels. mGluR5 levels in the NAc or the VP were unaltered. There were no changes for GABABR in any brain region assayed. This ex vivo snapshot of metabotropic glutamate and GABA receptor cellular distribution following induction of Meth-induced CPP is the first report to determine if these receptors are differentially altered after Meth-induced CPP. The results suggest that this Meth treatment paradigm likely induced a compensatory change in mGluR5 surface to intracellular ratio such that the surface remains unaltered while an increase in intracellular protein occurred. Synapse 65:1333-1343, 2011. (C) 2011 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据