4.6 Review

Evaluation of Internal Structure, Volume and Mass of Glacial Bodies by Integrated LiDAR and Ground Penetrating Radar Surveys: The Case Study of Canin Eastern Glacieret (Julian Alps, Italy)

期刊

SURVEYS IN GEOPHYSICS
卷 36, 期 2, 页码 231-252

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10712-014-9311-1

关键词

GPR; Density and volume estimation; Canin; Kanin; Alps; Very small glacier; Glacieret; LiDAR; Mass balance

资金

  1. University of Trieste
  2. Finanziamento di Ateneo per progetti di ricerca scientifica, FRA Grant

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We propose an integrated methodology to image the internal structure, evaluate the volume and estimate the densities of different units within ice bodies, useful for more precise mass estimation of very small glaciers. The procedure encompasses light detection and ranging (LiDAR) and ground penetrating radar (GPR) common offset data. The case study is the Canin Eastern Glacieret (CEG), a very small and maritime glacier in the Eastern Alps, and one of the lowermost glaciers of the European Alps. We calculate both volumetric and mass variations of the analysed ice body by integrating GPR measurements with LiDAR surveys acquired in different years (2006 and 2011). Between 2006 and 2011, the area of the glacieret increased from 8,510 to 17,530 m(2) with a gain of 9,016 m(2). The observed volume increase has been estimated in 96,350 m(3) (+97 %), which corresponds to a positive mass balance of 3.89 m w.e.. This quite unusual finding in the present global warming behaviour is mainly due to the above-average winter accumulation (c(w)) in the considered period. Moreover, the winter season 2008-2009 represented an exceptional event with a c(w) equal to 13.38 m, the highest of the available record. Thanks to density estimation, we infer the total mass of the CEG at the time of the geophysical surveys, comparing such results with the ones obtained with available empirical equations, observing an important mass gain in the 5 years considered.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据