3.8 Article

Preparing the ethical future of deep brain stimulation

期刊

SURGICAL NEUROLOGY
卷 72, 期 6, 页码 577-586

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.surneu.2009.03.029

关键词

Deep brain stimulation; Parkinson disease; Psychiatry; Depression; Ethics; Patient selection; Neuroethics; Resource allocation; Informed consent; Knowledge translation

资金

  1. Institut de recherches cliniques de Montreal
  2. Fonds de la recherche en sante de Quebec
  3. Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada
  4. CIHR [NNF 80045]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Deep brain stimulation is an approved and effective neurosurgical intervention for motor disorders such as PD and ET. Deep brain stimulation may also be effective in treating a number of psychiatric disorders, including treatment refractory depression and OCD. Although DBS is a widely accepted therapy in motor disorders, it remains an invasive and expensive procedure. The ethical and social challenges of DBS need further examination, and discussion and emerging applications of DBS in psychiatry may also complicate the ethical landscape of DBS. Methods: To identify and characterize current and emerging issues in the use of DBS, we reviewed the neurosurgical literature on DBS as well as the interdisciplinary medical ethics and relevant psychological and sociological literatures. We also consulted the USPTO database, FDA regulations and report decisions, and the business reports of key DBS manufacturers. Results: Important ethical and social challenges exist in the current and extending practice of DBS, notably in patient selection, informed consent, resource allocation, and in public understanding. These challenges are likely to be amplified if emerging uses of DBS in psychiatry are approved. Conclusions: Our review of ethical and social issues related to DBS highlights that several significant challenges, although not insurmountable, need much closer attention. A combination of approaches previously used in neuroethics, such as expert consensus workshops to establish ethical guidelines and public engagement to improve public understanding, may be fruitful to explore. (C) 2009 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据