4.1 Article

Leaf-litter breakdown in streams of East Malaysia (Borneo) along an altitudinal gradient: initial nitrogen content of litter limits shredder feeding

期刊

FRESHWATER SCIENCE
卷 34, 期 2, 页码 691-701

出版社

UNIV CHICAGO PRESS
DOI: 10.1086/681256

关键词

tropical; altitude; Borneo; litter decomposition; macroinvertebrates; resource quality; latitude

资金

  1. Monash University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Breakdown of litter in streams is an important terrestrial-aquatic C pathway in forests. Macroinvertebrate detritivore shredders that feed on litter may be more abundant in temperate than tropical streams because the feeding guild is generally restricted to cool waters and because temperate streams may have more high-quality resources. However, rich shredder communities have been found in some high-altitude tropical streams. We investigated litter breakdown and the variation in resource quality of native riparian vegetation in tropical streams at different altitudes (86-3393 m) in eastern Malaysia (Borneo). At each stream, we collected 3 native local leaf species, analyzed their initial resource quality, and incubated them for 56 d in coarse- (shredder and microbial colonization) and fine- (only microbial colonization) mesh bags. We incubated Macaranga tanarius litter in all streams to compare breakdown rates directly. Shredder-mediated breakdown of native litter was detected in only 5 of 24 cases and was not accompanied by altitudinal trends, whereas Macaranga shredder-mediated breakdown rates increased with elevation when rates were normalized for temperature (/degree-day). Regressions of resource quality and breakdown rates revealed consistent effects of initial N concentration in predicting breakdown rates that transcended decomposer and temperature effects. Shredder abundance, but not diversity, increased with altitude. The shredder guild may be important in tropical streams, particularly streams at higher altitudes and when litter N is not limiting.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据