4.1 Article

Randomized Clinical Trial of Single-incision Versus Conventional Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: Short-term Operative Outcomes

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/SLE.0b013e31822cfacd

关键词

laparoscopic cholecystectomy; benign gallbladder diseases; single-incision laparoscopic surgery; minimally invasive

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Single-incision laparoscopic surgery may reduce the complications of port site and postoperative pain. The improved cosmetic result also may improve the satisfaction of patients who have undergone surgery. Methods: The study enrolled 108 patients who consecutively underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy by the same surgeons and randomly divided them into single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy (SILC) and conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy (CLC) groups. Demographic data and short-term operative outcomes were collected and compared. Results: A total of 57 and 51 patients received SILC and CLC, respectively, from May to August 2010 at our institution. No significant difference was found with respect to demographic data including age, sex, and body mass index between the 2 groups. Similarly, short-term operative outcomes such as postoperative complications, length of stay, and visual analog pain score did not differ between the 2 groups. However, the incision of SILC (21.6 +/- 2.4) was shorter than that of CLC (30.8 +/- 2.6) (P=0.032). Conclusions: SILC seems to be a safe and feasible technique. It can be undertaken without the expense of added postoperative complication and operative time and provides patients with a minimal apparent scar.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据