4.6 Article

A task and performance analysis of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) surgery

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00464-018-6379-6

关键词

Endoscopic training; Endoscopic submucosal dissection; Colorectal cancer; ESD

类别

资金

  1. National Institute of General Medical Sciences, (NIGMS) from the National Institutes of Health [P20 GM103429]
  2. National Institutes of Health (NIH) [NIH/NHLBI 1R01HL119248-01A1, NIH/NIBIB 2R01EB005807, 5R01EB010037, 1R01EB009362, R01CA197491, 1R01EB014305]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BackgroundESD is an endoscopic technique for en bloc resection of gastrointestinal lesions. ESD is a widely-used in Japan and throughout Asia, but not as prevalent in Europe or the US. The procedure is technically challenging and has higher adverse events (bleeding, perforation) compared to endoscopic mucosal resection. Inadequate training platforms and lack of established training curricula have restricted its wide acceptance in the US. Thus, we aim to develop a Virtual Endoluminal Surgery Simulator (VESS) for objective ESD training and assessment. In this work, we performed task and performance analysis of ESD surgeries.MethodsWe performed a detailed colorectal ESD task analysis and identified the critical ESD steps for lesion identification, marking, injection, circumferential cutting, dissection, intraprocedural complication management, and post-procedure examination. We constructed a hierarchical task tree that elaborates the order of tasks in these steps. Furthermore, we developed quantitative ESD performance metrics. We measured task times and scores of 16 ESD surgeries performed by four different endoscopic surgeons.ResultsThe average time of the marking, injection, and circumferential cutting phases are 203.4 (sigma: 205.46), 83.5 (sigma: 49.92), 908.4s. (sigma: 584.53), respectively. Cutting the submucosal layer takes most of the time of overall ESD procedure time with an average of 1394.7s (sigma: 908.43). We also performed correlation analysis (Pearson's test) among the performance scores of the tasks. There is a moderate positive correlation (R=0.528, p=0.0355) between marking scores and total scores, a strong positive correlation (R=0.7879, p=0.0003) between circumferential cutting and submucosal dissection and total scores. Similarly, we noted a strong positive correlation (R=0.7095, p=0.0021) between circumferential cutting and submucosal dissection and marking scores.ConclusionsWe elaborated ESD tasks and developed quantitative performance metrics used in analysis of actual surgery performance. These ESD metrics will be used in future validation studies of our VESS simulator. [GRAPHICS] .

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据