4.7 Article

Exposure to volatile organic compounds and associated health risks in windsor, Canada

期刊

ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT
卷 120, 期 -, 页码 152-159

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.08.092

关键词

Volatile organic compound; Personal exposure; Excess cancer risk; Inhalation unit risk; Tumorigenic dose

资金

  1. Clean Air Regulatory Agenda of the Government of Canada

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: We examined relationships among measurements of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) and performed cancer and non-cancer risk assessments to determine potential adverse health effects. Methods: Personal, indoor and outdoor concentrations of VOCs were measured for 50 non-smoking adults in Windsor, Ontario during winter and summer 2005. The potential excess cancer cases associated with personal concentration were estimated by the Inhalation Unit Risk (USEPA IRIS) and Tumorigenic Concentration (Health Canada). Inhalation Reference Concentration (RfC) was used to evaluate non-cancer adverse effects. Indoor and personal concentrations were statistically compared. Correlations of personal concentrations were estimated to investigate the associations among VOCs. Results: Estimated median lifetime excess cancer risks (95th percentile upper-bound) of benzene and 1,3-butadiene were 8.09 and 4.77 per 1 million. Acetaldehyde presented the highest non-cancer risk. For some VOCs, the personal and indoor geometric means were similar, but arithmetic personal means were higher than the arithmetic indoor means (p < 0.05). Negative correlations among personal VOC concentrations were not sizable. Conclusion: Evaluation of potential cancer and non-cancer risks from VOCs at the personal level should not rely merely on ambient (indoor and outdoor) VOC concentrations. Our analysis showed that personal risk had a complicated pattern that needs further investigation. Our results can be used to prioritize mitigation strategies to protect human health. Crown Copyright (C) 2015 Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据