4.0 Article

Investigation of the mechanical properties of the human crural fascia and their possible clinical implications

期刊

SURGICAL AND RADIOLOGIC ANATOMY
卷 36, 期 1, 页码 25-32

出版社

SPRINGER FRANCE
DOI: 10.1007/s00276-013-1152-y

关键词

Crural fascia; Tissue mechanics; Experimental testing; Anisotropy; Viscoelasticity

资金

  1. CARIPARO Foundation (Italy)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The mechanical properties of deep fasciae strongly affect muscular actions, development of pathologies, such as acute and chronic compartment syndromes, and the choice of the various fascial flaps. Actually, a clear knowledge of the mechanical characterization of these tissues still lacks. This study focuses attention on experimental tests of different regions of human crural fascia taken from an adult frozen donor. Tensile tests along proximal-distal and medial-lateral direction at a strain rate of 120 %/s were performed at the purpose of evaluating elastic properties. Viscous phenomena were investigated by applying incremental relaxation tests at total strain of 7, 9 and 11 % and observing stress decay for a time interval of 240 s. The elastic response showed that the fascia in the anterior compartment is stiffer than in the posterior compartment, both along the proximal-distal and medial-lateral directions. This result can explain why the compartment syndromes are more frequent in this compartment with respect to posterior one. Furthermore, the fascia is stiffer along the proximal-distal than along medial-lateral direction. This means that the crural fascia can adapt to the muscular variation of volume in a transversal direction, while along the main axis it could be considered as a structure that contributes to transmitting the muscular forces at a distance and connecting the different segments of the limb. The stress relaxation tests showed that the crural fascia needs 120 s to decrease stress of 40 %, suggesting a similar time also in the living so that the static stretching could have an effect on the fascia.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据