4.6 Article

Enhancing autophagy with activated protein C and rapamycin protects against sepsis-induced acute lung injury

期刊

SURGERY
卷 153, 期 5, 页码 689-698

出版社

MOSBY-ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2012.11.021

关键词

-

类别

资金

  1. China Medical University Hospital [DMR-101-055]
  2. National Science Council [NSC 99-2314-B-039-027-MY3]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background. Autophagy plays distinct roles in apoptosis and the inflammatory process. Understanding the role of autophagy in sepsis-induced acute lung injury (ALI) may provide new insights into developing novel therapeutic strategies for this group of patients. The aim of this study was to investigate the regulation of autophagy in the septic lung and to use pharmacologic agents to modulate autophagy to study its functional significance. Methods. Mice were subjected to cecal ligation and puncture (CLP) or a sham operation. At 1 hour after CLP, mice were treated with vehicle, activated protein C (APC), rapamycin, or bafilomycin A1. Mice were humanely killed at 4 or 24 hours after the operation or were observed for <= 7 days. Results. CLP induced a systemic inflammatory response and significantly decreased survival. In lung tissue, increased leukocyte infiltration, inflammation, and apoptosis were observed. In contrast, autophagy was suppressed after CLP such that the expression of LC3II, Atg5, and Rab7 were downregulated. Rapamycin activated autophagy, limited the CLP-induced proinflammatory response, and downregulated apoptotic activity after CLP. The administration of APC after CLP had an effect similar to that of rapamycin. Both medications significantly improved survival 7 days after CLP. Conclusion. The downregulation of autophagy may lead to systemic inflammation and ALI after sepsis. The direct or indirect modification of autophagy using rapamycin or APC, respectively, resulted in improved survival. Enhancing or restoring autophagy early after sepsis seems to be a potential strategy for the treatment of sepsis-induced ALI. (Surgery 2013;153:689-98.)

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据