4.6 Article

Glypican-3 is a potential prognostic biomarker for hepatocellular carcinoma after curative resection

期刊

SURGERY
卷 154, 期 3, 页码 536-544

出版社

MOSBY-ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2013.02.014

关键词

-

类别

资金

  1. Natural Science of Guangdong Province [S2011010002572]
  2. Science and Technology Project of Guangdong Province [2009B030801124]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background. Glypican-3 (GPC3), an oncofetal protein, is overexpressed in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). The diagnostic efficacy of GPC3 for HCC has been evaluated intensively in recent years; however, the prognostic value of GPC3 for HCC has not been well clarified. The purpose of this study was to investigate the relationship between GPC3 and postoperative patient survival in a prospective database. Methods. GPC3 protein was detected by immunohistochemistry. The relationship between GPC3 expression level and patients' clinicopathologic factors was analyzed. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was used to calculate patients' survival and was compared by using the log rank test. The Cox regression model was used to identify the risk factors associated with prognosis. Results. GPC3 was expressed in 84% of HCC tissues. GPC3 protein expression was correlated with the number of tumors (P = .015), serum alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) level (P = .011), and TNM stage (P = .006). High GPC3 expression was an independent risk factor for poor postoperative disease-free survival (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.469; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.303-0.727; P = .001); and overall survival (HR = 0.435; 95% CI, 0.257-0.736; P = .002). Stratification analysis indicated that GPC3 had a good predictive value for tumor recurrence in patients with HCC who have normal serum AFP levels. Also, GPC3 expression status could predict the outcomes of patients with stage I disease. Conclusion. GPC3 is a potential and reliable biomarker for predicting tumor recurrence and overall survival in HCC patients after curative resection.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据