4.6 Article Proceedings Paper

Development of a novel murine model of aortic aneurysms using peri-adventitial elastase

期刊

SURGERY
卷 152, 期 2, 页码 238-246

出版社

MOSBY-ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2012.02.010

关键词

-

类别

资金

  1. NHLBI NIH HHS [R01 HL081629, K08/HL098560, K08 HL098560, R01/HL081629, T32/HL007849, T32 HL007849] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background. Our aim was to establish a novel model of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) in mice using application of peri-adventitial elastase. Methods. C57BL/6J male mice underwent infrarenal peri-adventitial application of either (1) sodium chloride (control; n = 7), (2) porcine pancreatic elastase (PPE; n = 14), or (3) PPE and doxycycline (PPE + doxycycline 200 mg/kg; n = 11) for 14 days. Aortas were analyzed by video micrometry, immunohistochemistry, qualitative polymerase chain reaction, and zymography. Groups underwent Mann Whitney U comparisons. Results. At day 14 compared with baseline, control animals had minimal aortic dilation, whereas fusiform aneurysms were seen in PPE (control, 20 +/- 3%; PPE, 82 +/- 15%; P <= .003). Doxycycline abrogated aneurysm formation (PPE, 82 +/- 15%; PPE + doxycycline, 37 +/- 10%; P <= .03). Compared with control and PPE + doxycycline, immunohistochemistry demonstrated greater elastin fiber degradation, macrophage infiltration, and matrix metalloproteinase-9 expression in PPE. Ki-67 and cleaved caspase-3 were lower in control versus PPE. The loss of smooth muscle marker expression seen with PPE was preserved in PPE + doxycycline. Zymography confirmed that both MMP-2 and -9 were more active in PPE than PPE + doxycycline. Conclusion. Peri-adventitial application of elastase is a simple reproducible in vivo model of aneurysm formation leading to consistent infrarenal aortic aneurysm development by day 14, with inflammatory cell infiltration and MMP upregulation. Doxycycline inhibits AAA progression in this model via limiting matrix degradation and preserving differentiated smooth muscle cells. (Surgery 2012;152:238-46.)

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据