4.6 Article

Long-term follow-up of patients with incidentally discovered pancreatic cystic neoplasms evaluated by endoscopic ultrasound

期刊

SURGERY
卷 147, 期 1, 页码 13-20

出版社

MOSBY-ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2009.05.014

关键词

-

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background. The management of incidental pancreatic cysts is not well established because of lack of information on their natural history. International Consensus Guidelines advocate observation of asymptomatic patients with small Lesions, despite limited data to support this approach. Methods. To characterize clinical outcomes in a cohort of asymplomatic patients with incidental pancreatic cysts who underwent endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) evaluation +/- fine needle aspiration (FNA). Results. Overall, 317 patients underwent EUS for evaluation of pancreatic cysts from 1995 to 2005. A total of 97/317 (31%) had asymptomatic, incidentally discovered pancreatic cysts; of 97 asymptomatic patients, 93 were contacted. Of these patients, 71/93 (76%) had lesions <3 cm and benign EUS features. All were followed without operative therapy. The mean follow-up was 44 months (range, 6-123). A total of 69/71 (97%) were alive and free of symptoms of pancreatic disease; 2 patients died of unrelated causes. Among these 71 patients with lesions <3 cm, FNA was Performed in 33 patients and cytology was negative for malignant cells in all. Overall., 45/71 patients had either follow-up cross-sectional imaging or EUS. All of them had stable lesions. Surveillance studies were performed with a mean follow-up of 28 months (range, 4-120). The 22 patients with lesions >3 cm and/or concerning EUS features underwent resection. Pathologic analysis revealed that 2/22 patients had adenocarcinoma and that 60% had premalignant lesions. Conclusion. Endoscopic ultrasound is helpful in evaluation of patients with small incidental pancreatic cystic lesions. Asymptomatic cysts with benign radiographic and/or endosonographic features may safely be followed clinically and with serial imaging. (Surgery 2010,147:13-20.)

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据