4.6 Article

Clinicopathologic significance of leptin and leptin receptor expressions in papillary thyroid carcinoma

期刊

SURGERY
卷 147, 期 6, 页码 847-853

出版社

MOSBY-ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2009.11.004

关键词

-

类别

资金

  1. Mackay Memorial Hospital
  2. National Science Council, Taipei, Taiwan [NSC-97-2314-B-195-004]
  3. Fourth Core Laboratory, Mackay Memorial Hospital

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background. Epidemiologic studies have shown that obesity is associated with an increased risk of thyroid cancer. Leptin, an adipocyte-derived cytokine, can act as a growth factor on certain normal and transformed cells. Aberrant expression of leptin or leptin receptor has been detected in some types of cancer. The aim of this study is to determine immunohistochemical expression of leptin and leptin receptor in papillary thyroid cancer to investigate the relationship between their expression and clinicopathologic features. Methods. The expression of leptin and leptin receptor was assessed in 49 primary neoplasms and 15 lymph node metastases using a semi quantitative immunohistochemical staining method. Results. Leptin and leptin receptor were expressed in 37% and 51% of papillary thyroid cancer, respectively. They were not expressed in normal follicles. In the primary neoplasms and the metastatic nodes, expression of leptin correlated closely with leptin receptor (P < .001 for the primary neoplasms and P = .017 for nodal metastases). Expression of either protein was associated with greater neoplasm size (leptin expression, 32.0 +/- 10.7 vs 20.5 +/- 8.4 mm; P = .001; leptin receptor expression, 27.9 +/- 11.5 vs 21.4 +/- 9.0 mm; P = .032). Coexpression of leptin and leptin receptor in primary neoplasms had greater incidence of lymph node metastasis (P = .038). Conclusion. Expression of leptin and/or leptin receptor in papillary thyroid cancer is associated with neoplasm aggressiveness, including tumor size and lymph node metastasis. (Surgery 2010;147:847-53.)

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据