4.6 Article

Two-year follow-up of splenic radiofrequency ablation in patients with cirrhotic hypersplenism: Does increased hepatic arterial flow induce liver regeneration?

期刊

SURGERY
卷 143, 期 4, 页码 509-518

出版社

MOSBY-ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2007.11.016

关键词

-

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background. Hepatocyte hypoxia may be a mechanism determining abnormal tissue oxygenation and dysfunction of the cirrhotic liver. Since the introduction of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) for patients with cirrhotic hypersplenism, we observed a phenomenon of visible hepatic regeneration. This study aims to investigate the potential mechanism of RFA-induced liver regeneration, and the 2-year outcomes of splenic REA. Methods. Forty patients who underwent splenic ITA for cirrhotic hypersplenism were followed for 24 months. Before and after RFA procedures, portal hemodynamics and liver and spleen volumes were measured by Doppler ultrasonography and computed tomography volumetry. Liver function tests and blood counts were also determined. Results. The splenic and portal. venous flows decreased, but hepatic arterial flow (HAF) increased dramatically after the RFA procedure. Liver volumes at 3 month post-RFA increased compared to the baseline volumes (872 +/- 10 7 vs. 821 +/- 99 cm(3), P = .031). A correlation was found between maximum absolute values of liver volumes (Delta liver volumes) and that of HAF (Delta HAF) in Child-Pugh class A/B patients (r = 0.60; P < .001). Leukocyte and platelet counts, as well as liver Junction, improved substantially during the 2-year follow-up. Patients with >= 40% of spleen volume ablated had better improvement of thrombocytopenia. No death or severe complications occurred. Conclusions. REA for cirrhotic hypersplenism is safe and efficacious. The increase in HAT, as a result Of splenic REA may improve liver function and induce liver regeneration in cirrhotics, but further studies are necessary to clarify the underlying mechanisms.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据