Reproducibility of functional aortic analysis using magnetic resonance imaging: the MESA

Aims To assess the test-retest, intra- and inter-reader reliability of thoracic aorta measurements by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Methods and results Twenty-five participants underwent aortic MRI twice over 13 +/- 7 days. All aortic variables from baseline and repeat MR were analysed using a semi-automated method by the ARTFUN software. To assess the inter-study reproducibility of aortic variables, we calculated intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) for individual aortic measurements. Intra-and inter-observer variability was also assessed using the baseline MR data. Mean ascending aortic strain had moderate inter-study reproducibility (11.53 +/- 6.44 vs. 10.55 +/- 6.64, P = 0.443, ICC = 0.53, P < 0.01). Mean descending aortic strain and arch pulse wave velocity (PWV) had good inter-study reproducibility (descending aortic strain: 8.65 +/- 5.30 vs. 8.35 +/- 5.26, P = 0.706, ICC = 0.74, P < 0.001; PWV: 9.92 +/- 4.18 vs. 9.94 +/- 4.55, P = 0.968, ICC = 0.77, P < 0.001, respectively). All aortic variables had excellent intra-and inter-observer reproducibility (intra-: ICC range, 0.87-0.99, inter-: ICC range, 0.56-0.99, respectively). Conclusion Inter-study reproducibility of all aortic variables was acceptable. Intra-and inter-observer reproducibility of all aortic variables was excellent. MRI can provide a repeatable method of measuring aortic structural and functional parameters.