4.2 Article Proceedings Paper

Cluster primary ion sputtering: correlations in secondary ion intensities in TOF SIMS

期刊

SURFACE AND INTERFACE ANALYSIS
卷 43, 期 1-2, 页码 228-235

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/sia.3491

关键词

cluster sputtering; damage cross-section; disappearance cross-section; efficiency; G-SIMS; molecular ion yields; sputtering yields; static SIMS; thermal spike

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A brief review is given of some of the behaviors of cluster primary ions in secondary ion mass spectrometry (SIMS). The increased secondary ion yields for cluster primary ions are covered as well as the raised sputtering threshold energies. For organic materials, the increase in intensity as the sputtering yield rises varies with the fragment mass through the spectrum. For Irganox 1010, the intensity of the deprotonated negative and the positive molecular ions increase as the square of the total ion yield. However, the intensity of intermediate fragments increase with a lower power, rising monotonically from unity at m/z similar to 400 to 2 at the molecular ion. The constitution of the Irganox 1010 spectra for Ar+, Bi+, Bi-3(+) and Bi-5(+) may be described by a basic spectrum such as that for Ar+ and two further 'spectra' which are product terms that multiply the intensity to a power defined by the cluster primary ion species, cluster number and energy. This resolution of the spectra into three components may be translated, for example, to the published data for Si where, for Si-t(+) secondary ion clusters, the terms are very much simpler: one is a constant, the second is a single exponential term dependent of the energy-deposition density, and the third is related to the cluster-binding energy. Finally, for studying molecular structure, the use of cluster primary ions in G-SIMS is outlined. Here, the cluster primary ions are critical for analyzing the weaker, high-mass peaks. (C) Crown copyright 2010. Reproduced with the permission of Her Majesty's Stationery Office. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据