4.2 Article Proceedings Paper

The isotopic comparative method (ICM) for SIMS quantification of boron in silicon up to 40 at.%

期刊

SURFACE AND INTERFACE ANALYSIS
卷 43, 期 1-2, 页码 36-40

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1002/sia.3629

关键词

SIMS; matrix effects; ion yield; quantification; boron; silicon

资金

  1. French National Research Agency, ANR

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This work extends the Isotopic Comparative Method, which has been previously introduced with the aim of correcting matrix effects, to quantify high concentrations of boron in silicon up to 40 at.% by SIMS technique. It requires a specific sample containing two isotopes of the element to quantify: for this study silicon sample with isotope B-10 present in constant, sufficiently dilute concentration, quantifiable with the conventional Relative Sensitivity Factor method and the other isotope B-11 implanted at very high concentrations. The intensity of B-10, whose concentration ratio with respect to silicon is known and constant, allows to measure the matrix effects induced by the presence of B-11 and to deduce the total boron concentration. The variations of the ion yields of boron Y-B(+) and silicon Y-Si(+) as a function of the boron concentration C-B are investigated up to 40 at. %. It is found that under Ar+ sputtering there are no matrix effects on Si+ ions, but a doubling of Y-B(+). Under O-2(+), Y-B(+) and Y-Si(+) increases almost linearly and similarly up to 2.5 times their value in dilute regime. With saturated O-2 flooding under Ar+ or O-2(+), Y-B(+) and Y-Si(+) increase similarly and weakly. These results allow defining an Extended Relative Sensibility Factor method for the quantification of concentrated boron profiles in silicon. It has been successfully implemented in a similar to 5 at.% boron layer obtained by Gas Immersion Laser Doping. ICM has been implemented for quantifying high dose boron implantation in silicon (C-B up to 40 at.%). Copyright (C) 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据