4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

Step-by-step investigation of degradation mechanisms induced by CMAS attack on YSZ materials for TBC applications

期刊

SURFACE & COATINGS TECHNOLOGY
卷 237, 期 -, 页码 71-78

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2013.08.055

关键词

TBC; Sol-gel; CMAS; Interaction; Degradation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Over the past decades, Thermal Barrier Coatings (TBCs) have become essential parts in gas turbine engines. In working conditions, TBCs are subject to many kinds of degradation (erosion, foreign object damage (F.O.D), oxidation, etc.) which deteriorate integrity and mechanical properties of the whole system. Moreover, with the aim to increase the turbine inlet temperature, a new type of damage has been highlighted: corrosion by molten Calcium-Magnesium-Alumino Silicates, better known as CMAS. In this paper, interactions between yttria-stabilized zirconia (YSZ) materials synthesized via sol-gel process and synthetic CMAS powder were investigated via a step-by-step methodology. The approach was conducted starting from the more severe conditions of interactions and then gradually gets closer to the interactions taking place in service. It was proved that CMAS can induce faster densification of the ceramic leading to a loss of strain tolerance of the protective coating. Besides, a dissolution/re-precipitation mechanism can also take place between YSZ and CMAS leading to the transformation of the initial tetragonal yttria-stabilized zirconia into globular particles of monoclinic zirconia. CMAS were also found to infiltrate the entire thickness of both EBPVD and sol-gel YSZ coatings at 1250 degrees C for 1 h. Nevertheless, the original non-oriented microstructure provided by sol-gel route leads to a different way of interaction due to the high reactivity of sol-gel precursors and materials. The behaviors of EBPVD and sol-gel coatings under CMAS exposure are discussed in this paper. (C) 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据