4.7 Article

Characterization of mechanical properties and adhesion of Ta-Zr-Cu-Al-Ag thin film metallic glasses

期刊

SURFACE & COATINGS TECHNOLOGY
卷 231, 期 -, 页码 332-336

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2012.03.087

关键词

Thin film metallic glass; Pulsed-DC sputtering; Mechanical behavior; Zr-Cu-Al-Ag-Ta

资金

  1. National Science Council, Taiwan, ROC [NSC-099B3034J4]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study aims to develop a new Ta-Zr-Cu-Al-Ag thin film metallic glass (TFMG). The Zr-Cu-Al-Ag TFMGs were fabricated by co-sputtering of a Zr-Cu-Al-Ag bulk metallic glass target and a 99.9 at.% Ta target, which was controlled under various DC power. A bipolar pulsed DC power unit was connected to the Zr-Cu-Al-Ag bulk metallic glass (BMG) target to avoid arcing. The chemical compositions of Ta-Zr-Cu-Al-Ag TFMGs were examined by an electron probe microanalyzer (EPMA). Nanoindentation and nanoscratch tests were adopted to evaluate the hardness, elastic modulus and adhesion properties of the TFMGs. The amorphous structures of all TFMGs were characterized by the X-ray diffractometry and transmission electron microscope. It was found that the Ta content ranging from 26 to 63 at.% played an important role in the mechanical properties of the TFMGs. Abrupt enhancements of the hardness and elastic modulus were observed for this Ta-based TFMGs as compared with the Zr-Cu-Al-Ag TFMG. Relative atomic distance calculated from the XRD patterns reached a good agreement with the trend of variation of elastic modulus. The values of critical loads, L-C1 and L-C2, increased with Ta contents in the Ta-Zr-Cu-Al-Ag TFMGs. In addition, the lighter and shorter crack was found for the Ta-Zr-Cu-Al-Ag TFMGs with higher Ta content. The crack propagation resistance (CPR) value was applied to probe the toughness of TFMG semi-quantitatively, revealing that TFMG with 63 at.% Ta possessed a CPR value six times higher than that of the TFMG with 26 at.% Ta. Crown Copyright (C) 2012 Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据