4.5 Article

Evolution and biogeography of the endemic Roucela complex (Campanulaceae: Campanula) in the Eastern Mediterranean

期刊

ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTION
卷 5, 期 22, 页码 5329-5343

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/ece3.1791

关键词

Aegean Archipelago; Campanulaceae; continental islands; drabifolia complex; endemism; Mediterranean; Roucela clade

资金

  1. National Science Foundation [DEB-0953677]
  2. Botanical Society of America, Society of Systematic Biologists
  3. American Society of Plant Taxonomists
  4. Division Of Environmental Biology
  5. Direct For Biological Sciences [0953677] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

At the intersection of geological activity, climatic fluctuations, and human pressure, the Mediterranean Basin - a hotspot of biodiversity - provides an ideal setting for studying endemism, evolution, and biogeography. Here, we focus on the Roucela complex (Campanula subgenus Roucela), a group of 13 bellflower species found primarily in the eastern Mediterranean Basin. Plastid and low-copy nuclear markers were employed to reconstruct evolutionary relationships and estimate divergence times within the Roucela complex using both concatenation and species tree analyses. Niche modeling, ancestral range estimation, and diversification analyses were conducted to provide further insights into patterns of endemism and diversification through time. Diversification of the Roucela clade appears to have been primarily the result of vicariance driven by the breakup of an ancient landmass. We found geologic events such as the formation of the mid-Aegean trench and the Messinian Salinity Crisis to be historically important in the evolutionary history of this group. Contrary to numerous past studies, the onset of the Mediterranean climate has not promoted diversification in the Roucela complex and, in fact, may be negatively affecting these species. This study highlights the diversity and complexity of historical processes driving plant evolution in the Mediterranean Basin.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据