4.7 Article

Water/oil repellency and work of adhesion of liquid droplets on graphene oxide and graphene surfaces

期刊

SURFACE & COATINGS TECHNOLOGY
卷 205, 期 19, 页码 4554-4561

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2011.03.128

关键词

Graphene; Graphene oxide; Superhydrophobicity; Work of adhesion; Water/oil repellency

资金

  1. National Science Council of Republic of China [NSC 99-2120-M-155-001, NSC 99-2221-E-155-078]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study examines the water/ethylene glycol (EG) repellency of graphene and graphene oxide sheets prepared by the chemical exfoliation of natural graphite powders. The graphene nanosheets were produced by reducing graphene oxide with EG under microwave irradiation. The graphene sheets were assembled into a thin paper, and a facile fluorination was used to coat a thin fluorine layer over the graphene paper. The graphene oxide paper is generally hydrophilic, whereas without aid of any fluorination, the resulting graphene paper displays superhydrophobicity (contact angle: 150.1 +/- 2.3 degrees) and low fraction in contact with solid (12.2%). Such low solid fraction may be attributed to the air pocket trapped in (i) the interspaces between graphene powders and (ii) the flake-like voids between graphene sheets, referred to as the Cassie state. The EG repellency of graphene paper can be significantly improved by surface fluorination. Taking into account Young-Dupre's equation incorporated with the Cassie parameter, the W-ad values of the graphene papers for water repellency were found to fall in the region of 9.62-12.5 mJ/m(2). The low W-ad value between the droplets and the graphene surface can be ascribed to the fact that porous graphene sheets offer an air cushion to repel the drop penetration, inducing the low work required for the movement of droplets on graphene paper. On the basis of the results, this study offers fundamentals on the water and EG repellency of graphene and graphene oxide surfaces. (C) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据