4.7 Article

Protection of cobalt-based refractory alloys by chromium deposition on surface Part I: Sub-surface enrichment in chromium by pack-cementation and diffusion

期刊

SURFACE & COATINGS TECHNOLOGY
卷 205, 期 12, 页码 3708-3715

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2011.01.027

关键词

Cobalt-based alloys; Pack-cementation; Chromium; Carbides

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The feasibility of surface chromium enrichment by pack-cementation was assessed for different low chromium-containing cobalt alloys, in order to improve their resistance against high temperature oxidation. A binary Co-10Cr alloy, two ternary Co-10Cr-0.5C and Co-10Cr-1.0C alloys and two TaC-containing Co-10Cr-based alloys were elaborated by foundry for the study. 7.5 h-long and 15 h-long cementations at 1050 degrees C, followed or not by a 75 h-long heat treatment at 1200 degrees C were performed on these alloys. Microstructure examinations performed using a Scanning Electron Microscope and concentration profiles using Electron Probe Micro Analysis-Wavelength Dispersion Spectrometry were realized in order to analyze the level of Cr-enrichment of the sub-surface region, with as studied criteria: the nature of the external Cr-enriched zone, the maximal chromium content on surface and the depth of chromium enrichment The Cr-enrichment of the sub-surface succeeded for the Co-10Cr alloy and for the two tantalum-containing alloys, with the formation of an external metallic zone containing around 30 wt% Cr. In contrast the chromium carbides-containing alloys were effectively enriched in chromium in surface but in the form of a continuous chromium carbide layer which can induce other problems such as spallation and then possible fast oxidation of the denuded alloy. Finally it appeared that only the carbon-free alloys, and the alloys reinforced by carbides more stable than chromium carbides, are potentially able to be successful enriched in chromium in their sub-surface by pack-cementation. (C) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据