4.7 Article

Electrodeposition and corrosion behavior of Zn coatings formed using as brighteners arene additives of different structure

期刊

SURFACE & COATINGS TECHNOLOGY
卷 205, 期 21-22, 页码 4985-4992

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2011.04.090

关键词

Additives; Benzylideneacetone; Electrodeposition; Polyethyleneglycol; Zn

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study examined the effect of the molecular structure of the aliphatic chain in arenes (phenyl + aliphatic chain) used as brightener additives on the reduction kinetics, morphology and corrosion resistance of Zn coatings formed by reduction of Zn(II) ions in a chloride electrolytic bath. Three such brighteners were tested benzylideneacetone (BDA), benzylacetone (BA) and butylbenzene (BB) dissolved in polyethyleneglycol (MW200) PEG(200), in order to determine the influence of the phenyl, carbonyl and/or C=C double bond present in these compounds on the zinc reduction process. The results showed that, in the presence of PEG200 alone, the reduction rate (j(0)) of Zn(II) ions was higher than in the absence of additives. By contrast, in the presence of the brightener-PEG(200) mixtures, the values of j(0) were lower, leading to a reduction in the size of the Zn clusters. Among the brighteners tested, no significant differences were observed in the values of j(0) as a function of the molecular structure of the arene aliphatic chain. SEM analysis revealed a change in the Zn coating morphology from hexagonal crystals with a (101) preferred orientation in the absence of additives, to flakes grouped in hemispherical clusters with (002), (100) and (101) crystallographic orientations when PEG(200) or brightener-PEG(200) mixtures were present in the electrolytic bath. In addition, the cluster size decreased in accordance with the j(0) values. The comparison of the values of corrosion current density indicates that there are no significant differences between them. (C) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据