4.5 Article

Variation in signal-preference genetic correlations in Enchenopa treehoppers (Hemiptera: Membracidae)

期刊

ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTION
卷 5, 期 14, 页码 2774-2786

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/ece3.1567

关键词

Assortative mating; Fisher's runaway; male-female genetic covariance; preference function; vibrational communication

资金

  1. NSF [IOS-1120790, IOS-0919962]
  2. UWM SURF fellowships
  3. Division Of Integrative Organismal Systems
  4. Direct For Biological Sciences [1120790] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Fisherian selection is a within-population process that promotes signal-preference coevolution and speciation due to signal-preference genetic correlations. The importance of the contribution of Fisherian selection to speciation depends in part on the answer to two outstanding questions: What explains differences in the strength of signal-preference genetic correlations? And, how does the magnitude of within-species signal-preference covariation compare to species differences in signals and preferences? To address these questions, we tested for signal-preference genetic correlations in two members of the Enchenopa binotata complex, a clade of plant-feeding insects wherein speciation involves the colonization of novel host plants and signal-preference divergence. We used a full-sibling, split-family rearing experiment to estimate genetic correlations and to analyze the underlying patterns of variation in signals and preferences. Genetic correlations were weak or zero, but exploration of the underlying patterns of variation in signals and preferences revealed some full-sib families that varied by as much as 50% of the distance between similar species in the E.binotata complex. This result was stronger in the species that showed greater amounts of genetic variation in signals and preferences. We argue that some forms of weak signal-preference genetic correlation may have important evolutionary consequences.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据