4.6 Article

Association between depressive symptoms and changes in sleep condition in the grieving process

期刊

SUPPORTIVE CARE IN CANCER
卷 23, 期 7, 页码 1925-1931

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00520-014-2548-x

关键词

Bereavement; Insomnia; Depression; Family; Grieving process; Early intervention

资金

  1. Japan Hospice Palliative Care Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Bereaved families often suffer from insomnia and depression. However, the associations between depressive state and changes in sleep condition during the grieving process have not been investigated. This study aimed to clarify the prevalence of insomnia symptoms and to explore associations between present depressive state and changes in sleep condition in the grieving process in bereaved families of Japanese patients with cancer. A cross-sectional, multicenter survey was conducted in 103 certified palliative care units. A questionnaire asking insomnia symptoms and depressive symptoms by the Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale (CES-D) was mailed to bereaved families (N = 987). The association between present depressive state (CES-D a parts per thousand yen7) and sleep conditions in the grieving process were analyzed. A total of 561 families were enrolled for analysis. Fifty-three percent of family members were considered to be in a depressive state at the time of the investigation. Prevalence of past insomnia was 86.5 % at within a few weeks before the patient's death (T1) and 84.5 % at within 6 months after the patient's death (T2) in all bereaved family members. However, in contrast to decreased severity of insomnia between T1 and T2 in the non-depressive group (p < 0.05), severity of insomnia was unchanged in the depressive group during this period (p = 0.139). Insomnia symptoms are highly prevalent and may be associated with posthumous depressive state in bereaved Japanese families. These results suggest the need for careful observation of changes in sleep condition during the grieving process.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据