4.5 Article

Frequency of spontaneous BOLD signal shifts during infancy and correlates with cognitive performance

期刊

DEVELOPMENTAL COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE
卷 12, 期 -, 页码 40-50

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.dcn.2014.10.004

关键词

Early brain development; BOLD frequency; Resting state fMRI; Cognitive Development; Functional connectivity; Infancy

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [R01MH070890-09A1]
  2. Foundation of Hope for Research and Treatment of Mental Illness Award
  3. UNC-Chapel Hill

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Numerous studies have been conducted to delineate the early development of different functional networks, based on measuring the temporal synchronization of spontaneous blood oxygenation level-dependent (BOLD) signals acquired using resting state functional MRI (rsfMRI). However, little attention has been paid to the change of the frequency properties of these signals during early brain development. Such frequency properties may reflect important physiological changes and potentially have significant cognitive consequences. In this study, leveraging a large (N = 86 subjects), longitudinal sample of human infants scanned during the first two years of life, we aimed to specifically delineate the developmental changes of the frequency characteristics of spontaneous BOLD signals. Both whole-brain and network-level examinations were carried out and the frequency-behavior relationship was explored. Our results revealed a clear right-ward shift of BOLD signal frequency during the first year of life. Moreover, the power at the peak-frequency for sensorimotor and lateral visual networks correlates with domain-specific Mullen Scales in 1-year-olds, suggesting the behavioral significance of the BOLD signal frequency during infancy. Findings from this study shed light into early functional brain development and provide a new perspective for future searches for functional developmental abnormalities. (C) 2014 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据