4.6 Article

NRS-2002 for pre-treatment nutritional risk screening and nutritional status assessment in head and neck cancer patients

期刊

SUPPORTIVE CARE IN CANCER
卷 23, 期 6, 页码 1495-1502

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00520-014-2500-0

关键词

Nutritional status; Nutritional risk screening; Patient-generated subjective global assessment

资金

  1. Finnish Cultural Foundation
  2. Helsinki University Central Hospital Research Funds, Helsinki, Finland

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The aim of this study was to assess the value of nutritional risk screening-2002 (NRS-2002) as a nutritional risk screening and status assessment method and to compare it with nutritional status assessed by subjective and objective methods in the screening of head and neck cancer patients. Sixty-five consecutive patients (50 male), with a median age of 61 years (range, 33-77), with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) were enrolled prior to cancer therapy. Nutritional status was assessed by NRS-2002, patient-generated subjective global assessment (PG-SGA), handgrip strength (HGS) and mid-arm muscle area (MAMA). Twenty-eight percent of patients were at nutritional risk based on NRS-2002, and 34 % were malnourished according to PG-SGA, while 43 % had low HGS. NRS-2002 cut-off score of a parts per thousand yen3 compared with the nutritional status according to PG-SGA showed 77 % specificity and 98 % sensitivity (K = 0.78). NRS-2002 was able to predict malnutrition (PG-SGA BC) both in men (p < 0.001) and in women (p < 0.05). NRS-2002 identified correctly patients with malnutrition with a score of a parts per thousand yen3 (p < 0.001) and risk patients with a score of a parts per thousand yen2 (p < 0.001). These results suggest that NRS-2002 seems to be a reliable indicator of malnutrition, while NRS-2002 with the cut-off score of a parts per thousand yen2 seems to be more reliable for nutrition screening in head and neck cancer patients prior to oncological treatment.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据