4.6 Article

Swallowing, nutrition and patient-rated functional outcomes at 6 months following two non-surgical treatments for T1-T3 oropharyngeal cancer

期刊

SUPPORTIVE CARE IN CANCER
卷 20, 期 9, 页码 2073-2081

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00520-011-1316-4

关键词

Swallowing; Nutrition; Oropharyngeal cancer; Chemoradiation; Altered fractionation radiotherapy

资金

  1. Queensland Cancer Council
  2. Cancer Collaborative Group, Princess Alexandra Hospital
  3. Radiation Oncology Department, Princess Alexandra Hospital
  4. Speech Pathology Australia
  5. Allied Health Research Scheme, Princess Alexandra Hospital

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Altered fractionation radiotherapy with concomitant boost (AFRT-CB) may be considered an alternative treatment for patients not appropriate for chemoradiation (CRT). As functional outcomes following AFRT-CB have been minimally reported, this exploratory paper describes the outcomes of patients managed with AFRT-CB or CRT at 6 months post-treatment. Using a cross-sectional analysis design, functional outcomes of 14 AFRT-CB and 17 CRT patients with T1-T3 oropharyngeal cancers were explored at 6 months post-treatment. Clinical and instrumental swallow assessments, weight and nutritional status, and the functional impact of treatment were examined. Inferior outcomes were observed for the CRT patients on the RBHOMS (p = 0.03) which was reflected in diet and fluid restrictions with 18% of the CRT group requiring modified fluids and diets. Although a trend (p = 0.07) was noted for increased lingual deficits and aspiration risk for fluids in the CRT group, no other significant differences were observed. Both groups experienced an average of 10 kg weight loss and reported reduced general and swallowing-related function. These preliminary data suggest functional outcomes following AFRT-CB and CRT were largely comparable at 6 months post-treatment. Treatment intensification in any form may contribute to impaired function which requires multidimensional intervention. Larger cohort investigations with systematic methodology are needed to further examine these initial findings.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据