4.7 Article

Pattern recognition of structural behaviors based on learning algorithms and symbolic data concepts

期刊

STRUCTURAL CONTROL & HEALTH MONITORING
卷 19, 期 2, 页码 161-186

出版社

JOHN WILEY & SONS LTD
DOI: 10.1002/stc.412

关键词

pattern recognition; damage assessment; learning algorithms; symbolic data; probability of true detection

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Learning algorithms have extensively been applied to classification and pattern recognition problems in the past years. Some papers have addressed special attention to applications regarding damage assessment, especially how these algorithms could be used to classify different structural conditions. Nevertheless, few works present techniques in which vibration signatures can be directly used to provide insights about possible modification processes. This paper proposes a novel approach in which the concept of Symbolic Data Analysis (SDA) is introduced to manipulate not only vibration data (signals) but also modal properties (natural frequencies and mode shapes). These quantities (transformed into symbolic data) are combined to three well-known classification techniques: Bayesian Decision Trees, Neural Networks and Support Vector Machines. The objective is to explore the efficiency of this combined methodology. For this purpose, several numerical simulations are first performed for evaluating the probabilities of true detection (or true classification) in the presence of different damage conditions. Several noise levels are also applied to the data to attest the sensibility of each technique. Second, a set of experimental tests performed on a railway bridge in France is used to emphasize advantages and drawbacks of the proposed approach. Results show that the analysis combining the cited learning algorithms with the symbolic data concepts is efficient enough to classify and discriminate structural modifications with a high probability of true detection, either considering vibration data or modal parameters. Copyright (c) 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据