4.7 Article

Lifelong Rupture Risk of Intracranial Aneurysms Depends on Risk Factors A Prospective Finnish Cohort Study

期刊

STROKE
卷 45, 期 7, 页码 1958-1963

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.114.005318

关键词

follow-up studies; intracranial aneurysm; risk factors; smoking; subarachnoid hemorrhage

资金

  1. Sigrid Juselius Foundation
  2. Biomedicum Helsinki Foundation
  3. Orion-Farmos Research Foundation
  4. Instrumentarium Research Foundation
  5. Maire Taponen Foundation
  6. Paavo Nurmi Foundation
  7. Paulo Foundation
  8. Finnish Medical Association

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background and Purpose-Our aim was to define for the first time the lifelong natural course of unruptured intracranial aneurysms (UIAs) and identify high-risk and low-risk patients for the rupture. Methods-One hundred and eighteen patients (61 women) with UIAs were diagnosed between 1956 and 1978 and followed up until death or subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH). The median age at the diagnosis was 43.5 years (range, 22.6-60.7 years). The median size of the UIA at the diagnosis was 4 mm (range, 2-25 mm). Analyzed risk factors for a rupture included sex, age, cigarette smoking, systolic blood pressure values, diagnosed hypertension, UIA size, and number of UIAs. Results-Thirty four (29%) out of 118 people had SAH during the lifelong follow-up. The median age at SAH was 51.3 years (range, 30.1-71.8 years). The annual rupture rate per patient was 1.6%. Female sex, current smoking, and aneurysm size of >= 7 mm in diameter were risk factors for a lifetime SAH. Depending on the risk factor burden, the lifetime risk of an aneurysmal SAH varied from 0% to 100%, and the annual rupture rate from 0% to 6.5%. Of the 96 patients with small (<7 mm) UIAs, 24 (25%) had an aneurysmal SAH during the follow-up. Conclusions-Almost 30% of all UIAs in people of working age ruptured during a lifelong follow-up. The risk varied substantially on the basis of risk factor burden. Because even small UIAs ruptured, treatment decisions of UIAs should perhaps be based on the risk factor status.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据