4.7 Article

The Effect of Lacunar Infarcts on White Matter Tract Integrity

期刊

STROKE
卷 44, 期 7, 页码 2019-+

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.113.001321

关键词

brain MRI; cognition; diffusion tensor imaging; lacunar infarct

资金

  1. VIDI grant from the Netherlands Organisation for Health Research and Development (ZonMw) [91711384]
  2. Netherlands Heart Foundation [2010T073]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background and Purpose-Lacunar infarcts may cause disturbances of the white matter (WM) structure remote from the primary lesion. Here, we used diffusion MRI and tractography to (1) spatially characterize microstructural abnormalities along WM tracts containing a lacunar infarct and (2) relate abnormalities in remote parts of the affected WM tract to cognitive outcome. Methods-In 17 participants with a lacunar infarct, we reconstructed the affected WM tract using fiber tractography. The corresponding nonlesioned tract in the contralateral hemisphere served as a control tract. Diffusion parameters (fractional anisotropy and mean diffusivity) were plotted along the tract and related to measures of memory, executive functioning and information processing speed. Results-Diffusion abnormalities remote from the lacune were present in the affected tract compared with the control tract up to 2 cm from the lacune (9% to 17% decrease in fractional anisotropy, 11% to 27% increase in mean diffusivity; P<0.05). The severity of these abnormalities attenuated with increasing distance to the primary lesion. Furthermore, the degree of remote WM disturbances was related to worse cognitive functioning on all 3 domains, independent of the size of the lacune (r=0.6-0.8; P<0.05). Conclusions-Lacunar infarcts are associated with abnormalities in the affected WM tract that extend centimeters beyond the lesion visible on conventional MRI. These secondary WM abnormalities may contribute to the cognitive deficits observed in patients with subcortical infarcts.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据