4.7 Article

Results of Membrane-activated Chelator Stroke Intervention Randomized Trial of DP-b99 in Acute Ischemic Stroke

期刊

STROKE
卷 44, 期 3, 页码 580-584

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.111.000013

关键词

acute treatment; neuroprotection; randomized controlled trial

资金

  1. PhotoThera
  2. Grifols
  3. Lundbeck
  4. Ferrer
  5. D-Pharm
  6. Bornstein from Dpharm
  7. German Research Council
  8. European Union
  9. Heinz-Nixdorf Foundation
  10. German Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF)
  11. National Institutes of Health
  12. Bertelsmann Foundation
  13. GlaxoSmithKline
  14. Boehringer Ingelheim
  15. Sanofi
  16. Syngis
  17. Talecris
  18. Allergan
  19. Bayer Vital
  20. BMS
  21. CoAxia
  22. Covidien
  23. Daichii-Sankyo
  24. EV3
  25. MSD
  26. Medtronic
  27. MindFrame
  28. Neurobiological Technologies
  29. Pfizer
  30. Schering-Plough
  31. Servier
  32. Thrombogenics Gorelick
  33. Brainsgate
  34. Bayer
  35. BI
  36. AGA Medical
  37. Asubio
  38. Cato Research
  39. AstraZeneca
  40. Roche
  41. Merck Frosst

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background and Purpose-DP-b99, a lipophilic moderate-affinity chelator of zinc, was postulated to improve recovery after acute ischemic stroke. We evaluated the safety and therapeutic effects of DP-b99 in patients with acute hemispheric ischemic stroke. Methods-The Membrane-Activated Chelator Stroke Intervention trial was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter, parallel-group trial of intravenous DP-b99 administered for 4 consecutive days (NCT00893867). Acute ischemic stroke patients within 9 hours of onset, but untreated by alteplase, with a baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score of 10 to 16, and evidence of language dysfunction, visual field defect, and neglect were eligible. The primary efficacy analysis compared distributions of functional status measured by modified Rankin score in the intentto-treat population of patients with any post-treatment outcome, adjusted for initial severity. Functional and neurological recovery were secondary measures. Home time was an exploratory end point. Results-Enrollment terminated at n=446 after the planned interim analysis determined futility; follow-up continued. Final modified Rankin score distributions were equal between DP-b99 and placebo-treated groups (P=0.10; P-adj adjusted for baseline age and National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale=0.21). Fewer patients recovered to modified Rankin score <= 1 in the DP-b99-treated group (45/218; 20.6%) than after placebo (63/219; 28.8%) (P=0.05; P-adj=0.10). Similarly, fewer patients attained National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale <= 1 after DP-b99 (42/218; 19.3%) than placebo (56/219; 25.6%; P=0.10; P-adj=0.26). Mortality was similar between DP-b99 and placebo intent-to-treat groups (36/218; 16.5% vs 33/219; 15.1%; P=0.68). Home time was unchanged by treatment (median 36 vs 36.5 days; P=0.25). Conclusions-Despite encouraging preclinical and phase II trial data, DP-b99 shows no evidence of efficacy in treating human ischemic stroke. (Stroke. 2013;44:580-584.)

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据