4.7 Article

Differential Association of Docosahexaenoic and Eicosapentaenoic Acids With Carotid Intima-Media Thickness

期刊

STROKE
卷 42, 期 9, 页码 2538-U263

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.110.613042

关键词

carotid arteries; docosahexaenoic acid; eicosapentaenoic acid; imaging; population study

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [HL68200]
  2. Japanese Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology [17209023, 21249043]
  3. [B 16790335]
  4. [A 13307016]
  5. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [17209023, 21249043] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background and Purpose-Recent studies reported the differential effect of docosahexaenoic (DHA) and eicosapentaenoic acids (EPA). We examined the differential association of DHA and EPA with carotid intima-media thickness (IMT) in Japanese individuals in Japan and in U. S. white individuals and explored whether DHA or EPA contributes to the difference in IMT between the two groups. Methods-A population-based cross-sectional study in 608 Japanese and U. S. white men aged 40 to 49 was conducted to assess IMT, serum DHA, EPA, and other cardiovascular risk factors. Results-Japanese compared to U. S. whites had significantly lower IMT (mean +/- SD, 618 +/- 81 and 672 +/- 94 mu m for Japanese and whites, respectively; P<0.001) and had >2-fold higher levels of DHA and EPA. DHA, but not EPA, had an inverse association with IMT in both Japanese and U. S. whites. The inverse association remained only in Japanese men after adjusting for risk and other factors. The significant difference in multivariable-adjusted IMT became nonsignificant after further adjusting for DHA (mean difference, 17 mu m; 95% CI, -8 to 43; P=0.177) but not EPA. In this multivariable-adjusted model, DHA but not EPA was a significant predictor of IMT (P=-0.032 versus 0.863, respectively). Conclusions-These data suggest that DHA may have a more potent antiatherogenic effect than EPA, especially in levels observed in the Japanese, independent of risk factors. (Stroke. 2011;42:2538-2543.)

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据