4.7 Article

PPARγ Activation Prevents Hypertensive Remodeling of Cerebral Arteries and Improves Vascular Function in Female Rats

期刊

STROKE
卷 41, 期 6, 页码 1266-1270

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.109.576942

关键词

capillary density; cerebral arteries; L-NAME hypertension; myogenic tone; PPAR gamma; remodeling

资金

  1. National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke [NS045940, NS043316]
  2. American Heart Association [EI 0540081N]
  3. Totman Medical Research Trust

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background and Purpose-Previous studies have shown that peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma (PPAR gamma), a ligand-activated transcription factor expressed in vascular cells, is protective of the vasculature. We hypothesized that activation of PPAR gamma could prevent hypertensive remodeling of cerebral arteries and improve vascular function. Methods-Ten female Sprague-Dawley rats were treated with the nitric oxide synthase inhibitor N-G-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester (L-NAME) for 5 weeks, 8 were treated with L-NAME plus the PPAR gamma activator rosiglitazone, and 8 received no treatment and served as controls. Blood pressure, myogenic activity, passive diameters and wall thickness of cerebral arteries, and brain capillary density were compared between the groups. Results-Treatment with L-NAME caused an increase in arterial blood pressure that was sustained with rosiglitazone treatment. L-NAME also caused inward hypertrophic remodeling and enhanced myogenic reactivity of cerebral arteries that was reversed by rosiglitazone. In addition, L-NAME hypertension caused rarefaction of brain capillaries by approximately 12%, whereas treatment with rosiglitazone increased capillary density by approximately 20%. Conclusion-PPAR gamma activation may be an effective and clinically relevant way to prevent hypertensive remodeling of cerebral arteries and capillary rarefaction as well as improving vascular function without affecting blood pressure. (Stroke. 2010; 41: 1266-1270.)

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据