4.7 Article

Triggers of Ischemic Stroke A Systematic Review

期刊

STROKE
卷 41, 期 11, 页码 2669-2677

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.110.597443

关键词

systematic review; ischemic stroke; triggers; risk factors; alcohol; infection; etiology

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background and Purpose-Several studies have suggested that exposure to triggers, could precipitate the onset of ischemic stroke (IS). We performed a systematic review of the potential triggers of IS. Methods-Two independent reviewers identified studies published between January 1980 and June 2010 from MEDLINE and Embase. Where appropriate, odds ratios (ORs) were combined. Results-A total of 26 studies identified 12 potential triggers. Twenty-two studies used a case-control design, and hazard period durations ranged from 2 hours to 3 months. The majority of studies were dedicated to alcohol abuse (n = 10) and clinical infection (n = 12). There was a significant association between IS and alcohol abuse of >40 to 60 g within the preceding 24 hours (OR = 2.66; 95% CI, 1.54 to 4.61) or >150 g within the previous week (OR = 2.47; 95% CI, 1.52 to 4.02) and infection within the previous week (OR = 2.91; 95% CI, 1.41 to 6.00) or within the previous month (OR = 2.41; 95% CI, 1.78 to 3.27). Other triggers have been far less investigated. There was a significant association between IS and anger, heavy eating, negative or positive emotions, sudden posture change in response to a startling event, birthday, and psychological distress and no significant association with drug abuse or heavy physical exertion. Regarding methodological issues, patients were rarely blinded to study objectives, and interviewers were rarely blinded to patient status. Conclusions-Research on triggers of IS has been mainly focused on acute alcohol abuse and clinical infection. More research is needed on factors such as physical exertion or acute stress. Future studies should use more appropriate designs and examine different hazard periods. (Stroke. 2010; 41: 2669-2677.)

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据