4.7 Article

A Longitudinal View of Apathy and Its Impact After Stroke

期刊

STROKE
卷 40, 期 10, 页码 3299-3307

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.109.554410

关键词

depression; function; motivation; stroke

资金

  1. Canadian Stroke Network.

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background and Purpose-Stroke survivors are often described as apathetic. Because apathy may be a barrier to participation in promising therapies, more needs to be learned about apathy symptoms after stroke. The specific objective was to estimate the extent to which apathy changes with time over the first year after stroke and the impact of apathy on recovery. Methods-The Apathy Assessed cohort was formed from stroke survivors participating in a longitudinal study of health-related quality of life after stroke. A family caregiver completed an apathy questionnaire by telephone at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after stroke (n = 408). Group-based trajectory modeling and ordinal regression were used to identify distinctive groups of individuals with similar trajectories of apathy over the first year after stroke and predictors of apathy trajectory. Results-Both 3- and 5-group trajectory models fit the data. We used the 5-group model because of the potential to further explore the apathy construct. The largest group (50%) had low apathy and 33% had minor apathy that remained stable throughout the first year after stroke. A small proportion (3%) of the study sample had high apathy that remained high. Two other groups of almost equal size (7%) showed worsening and improving apathy. Poor cognitive status, low functional status, and high comorbidity predicted higher apathy. High apathy had a significant negative effect on physical function, participation, health perception, and physical health over the first 12 months after stroke. Conclusion-Some degree of apathy was prevalent and persistent after stroke and was predicted by older age, poor cognitive status, and low functional status after stroke. Even a minor level of apathy had an important and statistically significant impact on stroke outcomes. (Stroke. 2009;40:3299-3307.)

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据